<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: [site update: About pages]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://apprejections.com/index.php/post/58/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://apprejections.com/index.php/post/58</link>
	<description>Send app-rejection news to @redglassesapps on twitter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:08:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://apprejections.com/index.php/post/58/comment-page-1#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 15:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apprejections.com/?p=58#comment-94</guid>
		<description>@Andy

re: authorial bias - this isn&#039;t an Anti-Apple site, it&#039;s a site for balanced, egalitarian reporting of what&#039;s actually happening. I&#039;ve already rejected a handful of app rejections that people have sent me because they were, simply, *absolutely normal* and 100% predictable. I&#039;m not here to give free publicity to spammers and lazy app-designers who believe that the rest of the world exists simply to make cash for them.

My primary aim is to document the whole range of the grey area between ACCEPT and REJECT, so that developers can *work out for themselves* what to try, and what not to try.

So ... expect my commentary to veer back and forth between pro- and anti- sentiments, dependent upon the individual case and how close it sits to the &quot;white&quot; side of grey, and how close it sites to the &quot;black&quot; side of grey...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Andy</p>
<p>re: authorial bias &#8211; this isn&#8217;t an Anti-Apple site, it&#8217;s a site for balanced, egalitarian reporting of what&#8217;s actually happening. I&#8217;ve already rejected a handful of app rejections that people have sent me because they were, simply, *absolutely normal* and 100% predictable. I&#8217;m not here to give free publicity to spammers and lazy app-designers who believe that the rest of the world exists simply to make cash for them.</p>
<p>My primary aim is to document the whole range of the grey area between ACCEPT and REJECT, so that developers can *work out for themselves* what to try, and what not to try.</p>
<p>So &#8230; expect my commentary to veer back and forth between pro- and anti- sentiments, dependent upon the individual case and how close it sits to the &#8220;white&#8221; side of grey, and how close it sites to the &#8220;black&#8221; side of grey&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://apprejections.com/index.php/post/58/comment-page-1#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 08:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apprejections.com/?p=58#comment-84</guid>
		<description>@Hakan. The difference though between Android and Apple, is that 3rd party applications can still be installed other ways. Apple has blocked all mechanisms to allow apps to be distributed and installed onto the iPhone (other then jailbreaking, which is basically hacking the iphone). There is also nothing stopping users from setting up their own application stores on Android also. 

That being said, I think this site is a good idea, but that opinions by the author should be kept to comments rather then embedded in the posts (because, it sounds like the author is making excuses for Apple on the late posts sometimes, which makes it seem a bit dodgy).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Hakan. The difference though between Android and Apple, is that 3rd party applications can still be installed other ways. Apple has blocked all mechanisms to allow apps to be distributed and installed onto the iPhone (other then jailbreaking, which is basically hacking the iphone). There is also nothing stopping users from setting up their own application stores on Android also. </p>
<p>That being said, I think this site is a good idea, but that opinions by the author should be kept to comments rather then embedded in the posts (because, it sounds like the author is making excuses for Apple on the late posts sometimes, which makes it seem a bit dodgy).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chaz</title>
		<link>http://apprejections.com/index.php/post/58/comment-page-1#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Chaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 19:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apprejections.com/?p=58#comment-67</guid>
		<description>@ Håkan

Tethering = Alot? Colour me confused...
Got many more examples or is it only tethering? (I&#039;m genuinely interested)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Håkan</p>
<p>Tethering = Alot? Colour me confused&#8230;<br />
Got many more examples or is it only tethering? (I&#8217;m genuinely interested)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Håkan</title>
		<link>http://apprejections.com/index.php/post/58/comment-page-1#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Håkan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 06:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apprejections.com/?p=58#comment-60</guid>
		<description>Alot of apps gets rejected from android also, no big difference there.
Tethering, where did you go?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alot of apps gets rejected from android also, no big difference there.<br />
Tethering, where did you go?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dero</title>
		<link>http://apprejections.com/index.php/post/58/comment-page-1#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Dero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 01:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apprejections.com/?p=58#comment-56</guid>
		<description>Also Download Squad

http://www.downloadsquad.com/2009/11/27/new-website-covers-the-rejected-iphone-app-beat/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also Download Squad</p>
<p><a href="http://www.downloadsquad.com/2009/11/27/new-website-covers-the-rejected-iphone-app-beat/" rel="nofollow">http://www.downloadsquad.com/2009/11/27/new-website-covers-the-rejected-iphone-app-beat/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Kiss</title>
		<link>http://apprejections.com/index.php/post/58/comment-page-1#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Kiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 21:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apprejections.com/?p=58#comment-53</guid>
		<description>Also on The Inquirer!

http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1563722/app-rejects-world</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also on The Inquirer!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1563722/app-rejects-world" rel="nofollow">http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1563722/app-rejects-world</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jez</title>
		<link>http://apprejections.com/index.php/post/58/comment-page-1#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Jez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 10:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apprejections.com/?p=58#comment-41</guid>
		<description>What, you missed the opportunity for self publicity! ;)

Great idea for a site Adam, it deserves to do well.

I see that you got picked up by mirror.co.uk http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/technology/2009/11/26/iphone-app-rejections-get-their-own-website-115875-21852699/

- Jez</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What, you missed the opportunity for self publicity! ;)</p>
<p>Great idea for a site Adam, it deserves to do well.</p>
<p>I see that you got picked up by mirror.co.uk <a href="http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/technology/2009/11/26/iphone-app-rejections-get-their-own-website-115875-21852699/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/technology/2009/11/26/iphone-app-rejections-get-their-own-website-115875-21852699/</a></p>
<p>- Jez</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technurse</title>
		<link>http://apprejections.com/index.php/post/58/comment-page-1#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Technurse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 06:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apprejections.com/?p=58#comment-37</guid>
		<description>All those developers who&#039;s aps have been rejected by apple, develop for the android phones.  Then you know ur not wasting your precious time only to be rejected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All those developers who&#8217;s aps have been rejected by apple, develop for the android phones.  Then you know ur not wasting your precious time only to be rejected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
