<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: REJECTED: ShakeCharge (&#8220;we will never accept it&#8221;)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://apprejections.com/index.php/post/68/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://apprejections.com/index.php/post/68</link>
	<description>Send app-rejection news to @redglassesapps on twitter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 11:23:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: App Rejections &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ACCEPTED: Cell Phone Tracker (fake app)</title>
		<link>http://apprejections.com/index.php/post/68/comment-page-1#comment-3264</link>
		<dc:creator>App Rejections &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ACCEPTED: Cell Phone Tracker (fake app)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 15:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apprejections.com/?p=68#comment-3264</guid>
		<description>[...] the other hand &#8230; Apple has consistently, time and time again, refused to allow this kind of app, both paid and unpaid. Why change that now? Why allow a handful of random developers the chance of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the other hand &#8230; Apple has consistently, time and time again, refused to allow this kind of app, both paid and unpaid. Why change that now? Why allow a handful of random developers the chance of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OderWat</title>
		<link>http://apprejections.com/index.php/post/68/comment-page-1#comment-411</link>
		<dc:creator>OderWat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 10:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apprejections.com/?p=68#comment-411</guid>
		<description>Well... Protecting people from buying/loading an app which clearly is a joke says a lot about the iPhone community.

The app idea itself is funny in my eyes and there are apps in the store which are far worse than this idea.

It seems to late to hold a good quality standard and from that point of view I can&#039;t understand why it is &quot;rejected in advance&quot; while other stupid stuff was allowed.

But the response itself is pretty good... and is what a lot more developers should have been told. But maybe not by apple but by their testers... or clients!

P.S.: I want a rating filter in the app-store NOW...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230; Protecting people from buying/loading an app which clearly is a joke says a lot about the iPhone community.</p>
<p>The app idea itself is funny in my eyes and there are apps in the store which are far worse than this idea.</p>
<p>It seems to late to hold a good quality standard and from that point of view I can&#8217;t understand why it is &#8220;rejected in advance&#8221; while other stupid stuff was allowed.</p>
<p>But the response itself is pretty good&#8230; and is what a lot more developers should have been told. But maybe not by apple but by their testers&#8230; or clients!</p>
<p>P.S.: I want a rating filter in the app-store NOW&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: App Rejections &#187; Blog Archive &#187; PULLED: P***y Lovers (for pretending to be porn)</title>
		<link>http://apprejections.com/index.php/post/68/comment-page-1#comment-364</link>
		<dc:creator>App Rejections &#187; Blog Archive &#187; PULLED: P***y Lovers (for pretending to be porn)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 18:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apprejections.com/?p=68#comment-364</guid>
		<description>[...] doesn&#8217;t like &#8220;joke&#8221; apps. C.f. &#8220;Please don’t ever re-submit this application, we will never accept it&#8221;. Unfortunately (for them), rather a lot of them have slipped through onto the store [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] doesn&#8217;t like &#8220;joke&#8221; apps. C.f. &#8220;Please don’t ever re-submit this application, we will never accept it&#8221;. Unfortunately (for them), rather a lot of them have slipped through onto the store [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor V</title>
		<link>http://apprejections.com/index.php/post/68/comment-page-1#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apprejections.com/?p=68#comment-222</guid>
		<description>Bill: That would be hilarious, iPhone prgnancy test, pee here...

As long as it says that its a joke before the download, why not?

Its like they are some sort of crappy PC-police. (PC=Politically Correct)

They all die sooner or later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill: That would be hilarious, iPhone prgnancy test, pee here&#8230;</p>
<p>As long as it says that its a joke before the download, why not?</p>
<p>Its like they are some sort of crappy PC-police. (PC=Politically Correct)</p>
<p>They all die sooner or later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://apprejections.com/index.php/post/68/comment-page-1#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 11:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apprejections.com/?p=68#comment-153</guid>
		<description>The idea suks. It&#039;s as bad as the fingerprint reader, fooling idiots. What&#039;s next, an iPhone pregnancy test?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea suks. It&#8217;s as bad as the fingerprint reader, fooling idiots. What&#8217;s next, an iPhone pregnancy test?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caleb</title>
		<link>http://apprejections.com/index.php/post/68/comment-page-1#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>Caleb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 16:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apprejections.com/?p=68#comment-132</guid>
		<description>This one looked like fun! I would have paid 99c for it! darn apple insiders!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This one looked like fun! I would have paid 99c for it! darn apple insiders!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: f</title>
		<link>http://apprejections.com/index.php/post/68/comment-page-1#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>f</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apprejections.com/?p=68#comment-127</guid>
		<description>They are inventing a phone where you can charge by shaking. Like those flashlights. They should just put a warning there, and allow it. That would be a good show off thing. Hopefully it gets added onto say cydia or something</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are inventing a phone where you can charge by shaking. Like those flashlights. They should just put a warning there, and allow it. That would be a good show off thing. Hopefully it gets added onto say cydia or something</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: okrum</title>
		<link>http://apprejections.com/index.php/post/68/comment-page-1#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>okrum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apprejections.com/?p=68#comment-117</guid>
		<description>I can understand why this one wouldn&#039;t be accepted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can understand why this one wouldn&#8217;t be accepted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: appfreak</title>
		<link>http://apprejections.com/index.php/post/68/comment-page-1#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>appfreak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 12:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apprejections.com/?p=68#comment-116</guid>
		<description>That could be a cool app if worked. I agree with the author, it is much better to get a clear and to the point answer like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That could be a cool app if worked. I agree with the author, it is much better to get a clear and to the point answer like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mobile Monday: Mobile App News for Week of November 22nd &#171; The SiliconANGLE</title>
		<link>http://apprejections.com/index.php/post/68/comment-page-1#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>Mobile Monday: Mobile App News for Week of November 22nd &#171; The SiliconANGLE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apprejections.com/?p=68#comment-106</guid>
		<description>[...] particularly liked the story of an app named ShakeCharge that was told quite pointedly by an App Store employee, “Please don’t ever re-submit this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] particularly liked the story of an app named ShakeCharge that was told quite pointedly by an App Store employee, “Please don’t ever re-submit this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
